![]() ![]() Without altering the lower mounts yet, I have increased the joint separation from the stock 9" to 12". I am happy staying with coil springs and 13" travel 6Pak shocks for my situation. Since this will move the axle mount about 2" forward from the stock position, I will use the Artec mounts to relocate the frame-side lower mount 2" forward. My plan with the lower mount is to get back to 9" of joint separation which will put the control arm bolt hole right at the bottom of the axle tube. I was hoping to minimize the gas tank skid contact by leveling the arms by raising them on the axle-side by 3" I have raised the axle-side track bar bracket 6" and I was thinking of lowering the frame-side track bar bracket possibly 1" after I complete the control arm mounts. The stock mounts with MC arms allowed me to almost max the 13" of shock travel but I was binding up on the fuel tank skid plate do to the increased roll steer at 3.5" of lift. Should I go back to stock brackets or should I continue with raising the lower axle-side brackets 3" and relocating the lower frame-side mounts using the Artec lower frame brackets? I believe I need to get back to the 9" of joint sepration by raising the lower axle-side mount by 3" which will require new lower frame mounts to maintain the stock lower control arm length. With the current new upper locations and the untouched lower mounts, I'm at 12.5" of joint separation on the axle. I was able to clearance the brackets which allowed me to articulate the axle in a simple up and down motion but still had serious bind when trying to simulate full stuff and droop on opposing sides. I thought things were looking good until I realized the brackets weren't deep enough and caused a bind when flexing the rubber based joints. I was able to keep the upper control arm frame mounts stock while raising the upper axle-side brackets 3". I want to continue using the MC control arms while mainlining a stock-like rear suspension. Purpose was to minimize rear steer while gaining ground clearance. The disconnect mount kit is designed to be used with the 8859-11 Synergy Jeep JL/JLU/JT Front Sway Bar Links.My intentions were to raise the rear axle-side control arm brackets to mimic Metalcloak's DB3 drop down brackets. The disconnect mount kit also includes easily removable linchpins that can disconnect the sway bar links from the axle, allowing them to be rotated up and out of the way and secured with the included frame mount brackets. This kit is designed for vehicles with 0-3 inches of lift height for lift heights above 3 inches, the disconnect mounting kit must be used in conjunction with Synergy part numbers 8855-01 or 8855-02. In the unlikely event of a factory electronic sway bar disconnect failure, the system can still be manually disconnected. However, manual disconnects may still be necessary on vehicles with significant suspension down travel to prevent the sway bar links from over-centering and limiting front axle articulation. This kit is compatible with all Jeep models, including Rubicon models with an electronic sway bar disconnect. The Synergy Jeep JL/JLU/JT Quick Disconnect Mounting Kit is intended for off-road enthusiasts who require a simple way to disconnect the front sway bar for increased front axle articulation. Install the Synergy 8859-12 Front Sway Bar Quick Disconnect Mounting Kit from XDP onto your 2018-2023 Jeep Wrangler JL or 2020-2023 Jeep Gladiator JT so it is ready for off-roading.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |